RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3070: The upper middle class in comparison

PC hardware
RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3070: Which graphics card provides the best value for money?

A nap on the motherboard: The comparison RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3070 reveals what’s dormant in the graphics cards.

© Remitski / Getty Images

Graphics card prices are in moderate descent. Reason enough to see which model is perfect for your wallet: AMD RX 6700 XT vs Nvidia RTX 3070.

The time of great sorrow in the graphics card market is almost over. The hype for cryptocurrencies is gradually disappearing, making graphics cards unattractive to cryptocurrency workers. A blessing for tired gamers looking for a new image accelerator.

The crucial question for most buyers is which graphics card provides the best value for money. As usual, the two top dogs AMD and Nvidia compete for the throne in their respective price segments.

The upper middle class: RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3070

In the upper middle class is about 500 euros AMD RX 6700 XT and Nvidia RTX 3070 opposite to. The AMD image accelerator currently costs (as of June 2, 2022) approx 550 eurosthe cheapest RTX 3070 buyers get from 620 euros plus shipping costs. Makes a huge price difference of 70 euros. But it must be said that the suggested retail price for both cards is only $ 20 apart. At the market launch, AMD charged $ 499 for the RX 6700 XT 479 and Nvidia for the RTX 3070.

cache

Both models obviously have different architecture. The RX 6700 XT comes with AMDs RDNA-2-Architecture to use. Some gamers already know them from Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X. According to AMD, the so-called infinity cache makes them special. The cache is the component of the graphics card that the graphics card processor uses to retrieve data from the main memory. The higher the bandwidth and the larger the cache, the more data the chip can theoretically process. The RX 6700 XT is donated by AMD 96MB “Infinity Cache”RTX 3070 has “only” 6MB L2 cache. Rumor has it that Nvidia is equipping the graphics cards in its 4000 series with a much larger cache.

shaders

A large, high-bandwidth cache helps handle higher resolutions and details in games when the chip can compute the data fast enough. AMD is relying on the Navi 22 chip for the RX 6700 XT. It is, of course, smaller than the manufacturer’s top models. It has only 40 units of account, which is accurate 2,560 shader units, ie calculators. For comparison: the RTX 3070 naturally uses Nvidia’s Ampere architecture in conjunction with the GA104 chip. He bids 5,888 more than twice as many shader devices.

clock speeds

However, they in no way alone determine how powerful a graphics card is. Because it also depends on how fast the card clocks. And this is where the shot turns: In the reference design, the RTX 3070 clocks in boost mode with up to 1.7 gigahertz. The default clock is 1.5 gigahertz. For comparison, RX 6700 XT: Here is the boost clock 2.5 gigahertz and the standard clock in games 2.4 gigahertz. The RTX 3070 has many computer devices that clock sparingly, and the AMD RX 6700 XT has a few that really make steam.

TeraFlops

What is better now? Now, in theory, the RTX 3070 comes to one FP32 value from 20.3 teraflops and RX 6700 XT on 12.4 teraflops. Clear victory for Nvidia. With the FP32 value, manufacturers indicate the theoretically possible computing power of a graphics processor. However, you must not make the mistake of equating this with the gameplay of the graphics card. For it depends not only on the theoretical performance, but is a combination of cache, shader devices, clock rate and graphics card memory.

stock and el

And that’s where there’s another difference on the cards, for the RTX 3070 has only 8 gigabytes GDDR6 memory, RTX 6700 XT trumps it 12 gigabytes GDDR6 memory. Already at launch, critics complained that the RTX 3070 did not have enough memory because it helps the graphics chip process particularly large amounts of data. This is especially important when playing games in 4K resolution. However, it must be said that neither of the two cards can handle 4K resolution in high detail in new games. High-end models are definitely needed here. 8 gigabytes of memory is sufficient for QHD, and the two cards are also designed for resolution. What the graphics cards also differ in, but not noticeably, is the power consumption. RTX 3070 works with 220 watts and RX 6700 XT with 230 watts TDP.

The game performance

The crucial question for most interested parties is which of the two graphics cards offers the best performance in games. The answer is that the RTX 3070 gets more frames per second (9 percent) fired on the screen than the RX 6700 XT, as reported by pcgameshardware. The same is true if you want to enjoy the new light calculation beam tracking in games.

Here, AMD is clearly at a disadvantage, but this is also due to the fact that AMD gives its cards significantly fewer computer devices for light calculation than Nvidia does with its RTX 3070. If you want to enjoy ray tracing to the fullest, you should definitely use an Nvidia card.

The RX 6700 XT can still come with a special feature and it is called Smart Access Memory. The feature gives the processor access to the graphics card memory, which increases the performance of some games. But this is only possible with a Ryzen processor and PCIe 4.0. However, the function does not compensate for the general difference in performance between the two cards.

Conclusion

Away from AMD or Nvidia fan camps are RTX 3070 without a doubt the more powerful graphics card. If the prices are only 20 euros apart, as with the recommended price, you should therefore reach for the RTX 3070. At the moment, however, there are 70 euros between the cards, which corresponds to a price difference of about 12 percent and that for about 9 percent more performance . The RX 6700 XT is therefore the better choice for price-conscious buyers. In addition, Ryzen users get on RX 6700 XT with AMD’s Smart Access Memory a great feature to squeeze the last bit of performance out of the PC. But it is not the deciding factor in the purchase.

You may also be interested in:

Source: pcgameshardware.de

This article contains so-called affiliate links. There is more information here.

Leave a Comment